Appendix-First mention of the tithe

by John Holbrook Jr.
A Biblical View, Blog #030 posted January 30, 2017, edited March 9, 2021.

This post is designed to supplement my blog entitled “Are you tithing to your local church?” It makes clear that tithing antedated the giving of the law by over four centuries.[1]

Chedorlaomer, king of Elam (later western Persia, now western Iran), put together a grand alliance consisting of his own forces and those of three other kings: Amraphel king of Shinar; Arioch king of Ellasar; and Tidal king of nations. This alliance made war on and subjugated Bera king of Sodom, Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, Shemeber king of Zeboiim, and Zoar king of Bela.

These five kings served Chedorlaomer for twelve years, but in the thirteenth year they rebelled.

In the fourteenth year, Chedorlaomer’s alliance appeared again and smote first the Rephaims in Ashteroth Karnaim, the Zuzims in Ham, the Emims in Shaveh Kiriathaim, the Horites in Mount Seir, the Amalekites in their country, and the Amorites in Hazezon-tamar. Then they entered the Vale of Siddim (a valley which probably extended from Jericho in the north to Elath and Aqaba in the south) and attacked the original group, which had rebelled: the kings of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboiim, and Bela.

They plundered Sodom and Gomorrah, and they took away with them both people and goods – including Lot, Abram’s brother’s son, and his goods.

When Abram heard that Lot was taken captive, he armed three hundred and eighteen of his servants, whom he had trained, and pursued Chedorlaomer to Dan (now Baalbek). Splitting his own forces, he attacked the alliance by night, smote them, and then pursued them to the neighborhood of Damascus, where he finally slaughtered them and recaptured all the people and goods that they had taken, including Lot.

As Abram returned from his great victory, he was met at the valley of Shaveh by the kings of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboiim, and Bela. Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine – he was the priest of the most high God – and he blessed Abram and said, “Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth: And blessed be the most high God, who has delivered your enemies into your hand.” And Abram gave Melchizedek tithes of all.

And the king of Sodom said unto Abram, “Give me the persons, and take the goods to thyself.”  And Abram said to the king of Sodom, “I have lift up mine hand unto the LORD, the most high God, the possessor of heaven and earth,  That I will not [take] from a thread even to a shoelatchet, and that I will not take any thing that [is] thine, lest thou shouldest say, I have made Abram rich:  Save only that which the young men have eaten, and the portion of the men which went with me, Aner, Eshcol, and Mamre; let them take their portion.”

After these things the word of the LORD came unto Abram in a vision, saying, “Fear not, Abram: I am thy shield and thy exceeding great reward.”

 © 2017 John Holbrook Jr.
____________________________________________________

[1] According to my chronology, Abraham tithed to Melchizedek in the 1880s BC, whereas God delivered the law to Moses in 1464 BC – approximately 420 years later.

Are you tithing to your local church?

by John Holbrook Jr.
A Biblical View, Blog #029 posted January 30, 2017, edited March 9, 2021.

If you are tithing to your local church, I hope that you will find here support for your continuing to do so. If you are not tithing to your local church, I hope that you will find here reasons to do so. [1]

                                                                Preamble

Christian stewardship refers to the manner in which we devote our time, talents, and treasure to the Lord and His work. I have often heard preachers say that we owe the Lord 100% of our time, talents, and treasure. That may get across the point across that the Lord expects us to live lives completely centered on Him, but it actually lets their parishioners off the hook. No one can and no one does devote 100% of his time, talents, and treasure to the Lord. He has to sleep, to keep himself clean and groomed, to eat, to work in order to earn the money that he needs to pay for all the necessities of life, to attend to his family, and to contribute to this church and community. The practical result of the preachers’ phrase is that their parishioners devote far less than ten percent of the time, talents, and treasure to the Lord and His work – and feel comfortable in doing so.

Christian stewardship is a broad subject, and thus here I want to focus on just one part of it, the tithe of one’s treasure. It is the part with which Christians have the most trouble.

Before I start, however, I want to stress several things things.

First, I’m acutely aware of the warning that James issued to those who teach: “My brethren, let not many of you become teachers, knowing that we shall receive a stricter judgment.”[2] Thus, I intend to adhere very closely to what the Bible actually says about tithing. What matters is what God says – not what I or anyone else says.

Second, “tithe” is a specific term; it means one tenth. “Tithing” is also a specific term; it means paying one tenth of one’s income and capital gains.

Third, the Bible distinguishes between tithes and offerings: the tithe consists of money or goods (in a barter economy) that belong to God and must be handled as God prescribes; offerings, on the other hand, consist of money and goods that belongs to us and may be handled as we see fit. Here I address only tithes.

Fourth, I want to stress the inerrancy of God’s Word. In his Gospel, John wrote: “…scripture cannot be broken.”[3] Yet, so often, we don’t pay attention to what God’s Word says, and then we wonder why we fail to receive God’s blessings or why we experience so many afflictions.

                                                                The Tithe

Now let us consider some of the things the Bible says about tithing.

The tithe is first mentioned in Genesis 14. After Abraham destroyed the armies of Chedorlaomer’s coalition in the valley of Shaveh, verses 18-20 state, “Then Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine; he was the priest of God Most High. And he blessed him and said: ‘Blessed be Abram of God Most High, Possessor of heaven and earth; And blessed be God Most High, Who has delivered your enemies into your hand.’ And he gave him a tithe of all.”[4] The author of Hebrews identified Melchisedek as the King of Salem, the King of Peace, the High Priest of God, the Lord Jesus Christ.[5] Thus, over 400 years before God delivered the law to Moses on Mount Sinai, Abraham tithed to God.

Now prior to the battle with Chedorlaomer’s coalition, God made certain promises to Abraham, and Moses wrote that Abraham believed God, and that God “…accounted it to him for righteousness.”[6] For that reason, the Bible identifies Abraham as the father of the faithful.

What were the consequences of Abraham’s faithfulness? Genesis 13:2 states: “Abram was very rich in livestock, in silver, and in gold.”[7] Did you catch that? Abraham was very rich. Moreover, he was rich in tangible things – “in livestock, in silver, and in gold.”

And how did Abraham become very rich? Abraham’s servant Eleazer explains how: “The LORD has blessed my master greatly, and he has become great; and He has given him flocks and herds, silver and gold, male and female servants, and camels and donkeys. And Sarah my master’s wife bore a son to my master when she was old; and to him he [God] has given all that he has.”[8] God himself blessed Abraham with riches.

We are looking at a biblical principle here. Now, please don’t misunderstand me. I’m not saying that God promises to make each one of us as rich as Abraham,[9] but I am saying that God wants his people (plural) to prosper and thereby to be a blessing to others. God promises his people (plural) that they will prosper if they trust in him and tithe to him.

Now let’s examine the most important passages regarding tithing in the Bible.

First, let’s look at Malachi 3:6-11, which reveals the nature of the tithe and contains probably the most startling promise in the Bible.

“For I am the LORD, I do not change; Therefore you are not consumed, O sons of Jacob. Yet from the days of your fathers You have gone away from My ordinances And have not kept them. Return to Me, and I will return to you,” Says the LORD of hosts. “But you said, ‘In what way shall we return?’  Will a man rob God? Yet you have robbed Me! But you say,’In what way have we robbed You?’ In tithes and offerings. You are cursed with a curse, For you have robbed Me, Even this whole nation. Bring all the tithes into the storehouse, That there may be food in My house, And try Me now in this,” Says the LORD of hosts, “If I will not open for you the windows of heaven And pour out for you such blessing That there will not be room enough to receive it. “And I will rebuke the devourer for your sakes, So that he will not destroy the fruit of your ground, Nor shall the vine fail to bear fruit for you in the field,” Says the LORD of hosts.[10]

What does this passage actually say?

Verse 6 says, “…I am the LORD, I do not change.” The Lord does not change His mind. The Book of Malachi was written about 425 B.C. If the Lord wanted His people to tithe then, He wants them to tithe now.

Verse 7 says, “… You have gone away from My ordinances And have not kept them.” The issue here is tithing. God has told his people to tithe. They have not been doing so.

Verse 8 says, “Return to Me, and I will return to you.” Their failure to tithe has separated them from God. If they return to tithing, he will return to them.

Verse 8 also says, “Will a man rob God? Yet you have robbed Me! But you say,’In what way have we robbed You?’ In tithes and offerings.” Moses wrote in Leviticus, “And all the tithe of the land, whether of the seed of the land or of the fruit of the tree, is the Lord’s. It is holy to the Lord.”[11] Their failure to tithe was actually robbing God of what belonged to him.

Verse 9 says, “You are cursed with a curse, For you have robbed Me.” Because they were robbing God, they were living under a curse – the curse which Adam’s disobedience brought upon the world. There are at least two aspects to this curse: First, there is the loss of eternal fellowship with God. Jesus’ death on the cross redeems a person from that aspect of the curse when he puts his trust in Jesus for his salvation. Second, there is the difficulty of coaxing sustenance from the ground. Do you remember what God said to Adam? “Cursed is the ground for your sake; In toil you shall eat of it All the days of your life.”[12] Apparently God delivers his people from this aspect of the curse – at least to some extent – when they tithe. When they fail to tithe, however, they forsake God’s promise of protection and providence and live under the curse on the ground. Don’t be fooled by the agrarian context of all these passages regarding tithes, blessings, and curses. The Bible is presenting principles here.

Verse 10 says, “Bring all the tithes….” Notice the choice of words. God did not say, “Give….” He said, “Bring.…” Our tithes are not ours to give. They belong to God, and therefore he said the equivalent of “Bring them to me.” Then God said, “…all the tithes.” He did not say, “…some of the tithes” or “…part of the tithes.” He said “…all of the tithes.” He claims a full ten percent of our increase – not 9% or less. (Actually, as Gary North has pointed out, if you think about it, a 10% franchise fee is actually remarkably low. You can’t get such a generous deal from either McDonalds or Starbucks.)

Verse 10 also says, “…into the storehouse….” In Deuteronomy, Moses identified the storehouse as “…the place where the Lord your God chooses, to make his name abide.”[13] The storehouse is God’s house. It’s the place set aside for the worship and praise of God, the place from which the Word of God should go forth to feed the people. Notice the word is singular. God’s people are to bring the full tithe to one place.

Verse 10 also says, “…that there may be food in my house.” As I have just indicated, the purpose of the tithe is to ensure that God’s people are fed – fed with the Word of God written and the Word of God incarnate.

Verse 10 also says, “And prove me now in this, Says the Lord of Hosts.” God, the Creator and Sovereign of the Universe, invites his people to test him – the only time that he does so in the entire Bible. He says to them, do as I command and then see what I will do.

Verse 10 ends with, “…if I will not open for you the windows of heaven And pour out for you such blessing that there will not be room enough to receive it.” These are the same words used to describe the beginnings of the flood. In Genesis, Moses wrote, “In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.”[14] God promises to reward obedience with a deluge of blessings.

Finally, verse 11 says, “And I will rebuke the devourer for your sakes, So that he will not destroy the fruit of your ground, Nor shall the vine fail to bear fruit in the field.” God’s people won’t have to worry about their blessings being stolen. God himself will prevent Satan from devouring them.

Clearly, this passage in Malachi is telling us that we must bring a full 10% of the increase (income and capital gains) to the Lord’s house, which for us is the local church where we worship on a regular basis. If we do so, He will bless us abundantly, here and now. If we do not bring the tithe to His house, however, we will live and work under the original curse on creation, and Satan will devour the fruits of our work.

                                                   Presentation of the Tithe

Now let’s look at Deuteronomy 26:1-11, which indicates how God wants us to present our tithes to him.

 And it shall be, when you come into the land which the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, and you possess it and dwell in it, that you shall take some of the first of all the produce of the ground, which you shall bring from your land that the LORD your God is giving you, and put it in a basket and go to the place where the LORD your God chooses to make His name abide. And you shall go to the one who is priest in those days, and say to him, “I declare today to the LORD your God that I have come to the country which the LORD swore to our fathers to give us.” Then the priest shall take the basket out of your hand and set it down before the altar of the LORD your God.  And you shall answer and say before the LORD your God: “My father was a Syrian, about to perish, and he went down to Egypt and dwelt there, few in number; and there he became a nation, great, mighty, and populous.  But the Egyptians mistreated us, afflicted us, and laid hard bondage on us.  Then we cried out to the LORD God of our fathers, and the LORD heard our voice and looked on our affliction and our labor and our oppression. So the LORD brought us out of Egypt with a mighty hand and with an outstretched arm, with great terror and with signs and wonders. He has brought us to this place and has given us this land,” a land flowing with milk and honey; and now, behold, I have brought the firstfruits of the land which you, O LORD, have given me.” Then you shall set it before the LORD your God, and worship before the LORD your God. So you shall rejoice in every good thing which the LORD your God has given to you and your house, you and the Levite and the stranger who is among you (NKJV Deuteronomy 26:2-11).

Again, what does this passage actually say?

Verse 2 says, “…you shall take some of the first of all the produce of the ground….” The King James Version omits the word “some.” God’s people are to bring the first part, the top part, the best part to the Lord – not the last or left over part.

Verse 2 also says, “…put it in a basket….” They are instructed to put their tithe in a container – the offering plate, if you will.

Verse 2 also says, “…go to the place where the Lord your God chooses, to make his name abide.” Previously I have pointed out that this is God’s house. If God sends his people to a particular place (your local church), that is where he expects them to present their tithes to him.

Verse 3 says, “And you shall go to the one who is the priest in those days.” Today, our High Priest is the Lord Jesus Christ.[15]

Verse 3 also says, “…and say to him, ‘I declare today to the Lord your God that I have come to the country which the Lord swore to our fathers to give us.’” For the ancient Hebrews, that country was Canaan, the Promised Land. For us today, the country is the Kingdom of God.

Verse 4 says, “Then the priest shall take the basket out of your hand and set it down before the altar of the Lord your God.” Today, that is just what Jesus does for us. He presents our tithes to God at the altar in heaven.

Verse 5 says, “And you shall answer and say before the Lord your God,….” I won’t reread the entire profession. Israel’s profession looked back to their bondage in Egypt, to their miraculous deliverance by the hand of God, and to their receipt of their inheritance – the Promised Land. We must look back to our bondage in sin, to our miraculous deliverance by the death and resurrection of our Lord, and to our entrance – upon our conversion – into the Kingdom of God.

Thus, when we bring our full tithe to the Lord in this place, we should say a prayer similar to the following:

Heavenly Father, we profess this day to you that we have come into the inheritance which you swore to give us. We are in the land which you have provided for us in Jesus Christ. We were sinners serving Satan; he was our god. But we called upon the name of Jesus, and you heard our cry. You delivered us from the power and authority of darkness and translated us into the Kingdom of your dear Son.

Jesus, as our Lord and High Priest, we bring to you the first fruits of our income that you may worship the Lord our God with them.

Heavenly Father, we have heard your voice and brought our tithes into your house, as you commanded us to do. Now we rejoice in all the good which you have given to us and to our households. In Jesus’ name, we pray. Amen.[16].

I would end here, excepting that you may still regard what the Scriptures say regarding tithing as applying to the Old Testament period, but not to the New Testament era. Let’s look at Matthew 5:17-20, a portion of Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount.

Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.  For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.  Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.  For I say to you, that unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven.[17]

These are the words of the One who, as the author of Hebrews wrote, “…is the same yesterday, today, and forever…”[18]  He is the One who is our Creator, our Sustainer, our Provider, our Protector, our Redeemer, and our LORD.

Some personal conclusions

As you reflect on the foregoing, I ask that you keep in mind some conclusions I have reached about God’s reasons for demanding that we tithe.

First, it provides the resources necessary to sustain the local church. Without those resources, the local church is anemic and unable to pay for its internal activities (worship, education, fellowship, pastoral care, administration, property management, finance, and communications) – let alone its external activities (evangelism, service, and mission support).

Second, based on my own experience and the experience of others whom I have mentored, it breaks the power of money in our lives – that is, we experience a deep sense that, aside from prudent budgeting and planning, we can leave the worrying about our financial situation to God and attend to the business of living for him.

Third, it teaches us to trust God, not just with our finances, but with our entire lives.

Nota Bene: giving anything less than 10% to our local church doesn’t accomplish these things.

Lastly, I state the obvious: Regardless of your income bracket, paying out a tithe to your church and, in addition, offerings to individuals in need and non-church ministries means that you cannot maintain the same lifestyle as your non-Christian peers. That is one of the costs of discipleship.

© 2017 John Holbrook Jr.
_________________________________________________________

[1] This blog owes much to many sources, but particularly to the following: John Guest’s Giving to God, National Institute of Christian Leadership, Sewickley, PA, 1983; John Howe’s “Bring in the full tithes…and see…“, Truro Church, Fairfax, VA, 1979; Gary North’s The Covenantal Tithe, American Vision Inc., Powder Springs GA, 2011, Tithing and Dominion, Ross House Books, Vallecito CA, 1979, and Tithing and the Church, Institute for Christian Economics, Tyler TX, 1994; and Frederick K.C. Price’s High Finance: God’s Financial Plan – Tithes and Offerings, Harrison House, Tulsa, OK, 1984.

[2] NKJV James 3:1.

[3] NKJV John 10: 35.

[4] NKJVA Genesis 14:18-20.

[5] Hebrews 7.

[6] NKJV Genesis 15:6.

[7] NKJV Genesis 13:2.

[8] NKJV Genesis 24:34-37.

[9] I think the “health and wealth” or “name it and claim it” gospels, by interpreting God’s blessings in purely material terms and by ignoring the distinction between God’s people (plural) and an individual believer (singular), seriously misrepresents God’s promises in these respects. If you read my blog entitled “Have you carefully counted the cost?” you will see that the promises of persecution and suffering outweigh the promises of blessings like health and wealth by a wide margin.

[10] NKJV Malachi 3:6-11.

[11] NKJV Leviticus 27:30.

[12] NKJV Genesis 3:17.

[13] NKJV Deuteronomy 26:2.

[14] NKJV Genesis 7:11.

[15] The author of Hebrews wrote, “Therefore holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle and High Priest of our confession, Christ Jesus.”

[16] The first two paragraphs come from a prayer by Frederick K.C. Price; the last paragraph is mine.

[17] NKJV Matthew 5:17-20

[18] NKJV Hebrews 13:8.

Have you carefully counted the cost?

by John Holbrook Jr.
A Biblical View, Blog #028 posted January 23, 2017, edited March 9, 2021.

Have you carefully counted the cost of being one of the Lord’s disciples? Before you answer that question, consider the following passage in which He discusses what is involved in discipleship:

[Jesus said] If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple. For which of you, intending to build a tower, sitteth not down first, and counteth the cost , whether he have sufficient to finish it? Lest haply, after he hath laid the foundation, and is not able to finish it, all that behold it begin to mock him, Saying, This man began to build, and was not able to finish. Or what king, going to make war against another king, sitteth not down first, and consulteth whether he be able with ten thousand to meet him that cometh against him with twenty thousand? Or else, while the other is yet a great way off, he sendeth an ambassage, and desireth conditions of peace. So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple. Salt is good: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be seasoned? It is neither fit for the land, nor yet for the dunghill; but men cast it out. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear. (KJV Luke 14:26-15:1)

Here the Lord lists three requirements:

First, a disciple must put his allegiance to the Lord above all other attachments – attachments to his family; even attachment to his life:

[Jesus said] If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. (KJV Luke 14:26)

Second, a disciple must be willing to suffer:

 [Jesus said] And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple. (KJV Luke 14:27)

Third, a disciple must be willing to relinquish all that he possesses:

[Jesus said] So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple. (KJV Luke 14:33)

But there are other requirements as well:

A disciple must declare his allegiance to the Lord – openly and without shame:

[Paul wrote] That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. (KJV Rom 10:9-11)

A disciple must evangelize others – that is, declare the Gospel (good news) to all those who have not yet heard and not yet responded to it:

And [Jesus] said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.  He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. (KJV Mark 16:15-16)

Now, what can a disciple expect if he meets all of the above requirements?

Alas, a disciple can expect to be hated and persecuted.

[Jesus said] If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. If ye were of the world , the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world , but I have chosen you out of the world , therefore the world hateth you. Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also. But all these things will they do unto you for my name’s sake, because they know not him that sent me. (KJV John 15:18-21)

What forms does this persecution take? The answer lies in Revelation 6, which describes what happens on the earth as the Lamb who sits on the Throne of God – that is, Jesus the Messiah – opens the book[1] in His hand, one seal at a time.

1st seal – White horse = Gospel is preached and conquers (6:1-2).

And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard, as it were the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts saying, Come and see. And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.

The opening of the first seal reveals a white horse, and sitting on the white horse is Him that has been crowned and is setting forth to conquer. Now common sense tells us that the rider of the white horse is the Lord Himself. Furthermore Revelation 19:11 states, “And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, …and his name is called The Word of God….And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.” What we have here is the preaching of the gospel. As soon as believers perceive that Jesus reigns, they must go forth and proclaim that good news to the nations, they must make disciples of all men. Note: the rider carries a bow. In Psalm 45, which speaks of the Lord, verse 5 says, “Thine arrows are sharp in the heart of the king’s enemies; whereby the people fall under thee.”

2nd seal – Red horse = Saints are killed (6:3-4).

And when he had opened the second seal, I heard the second beast say, Come and see. And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword.

Following the white horse is a red horse whose rider is given a great sword (of sacrifice) and “granted” the power to make war against and kill the saints. Wherever and whenever the gospel is preached, saints are sacrificed. The preaching of the gospel produces martyrs. The world hates the saints, persecutes the saints, and kills the saints. All this is part of God’s plan; the saints must expect it. How many new believers discover that, after they were born again and became disciples of Jesus, their acquaintances, friends, and even families rejected them? We in America can be thankful that we have not experienced worse – or perhaps we should wonder if we are preaching the gospel clearly enough.

3rd seal – Black horse = Saints are persecuted (6:5-6).

And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand.  And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine. 

Following the red horse is a black horse whose rider carries a pair of scales in his hand, and a voice proclaims that a measure (quart) of wheat cost a penny (or denarius), and three measures (quarts) of barley cost a penny (or denarius). A measure (or quart) of wheat or barley met one person’s food requirements for a day; and a denarius was a day’s wages. So a working man could feed himself with fine food or three people with coarse food. In addition, luxury items like oil and wine were available to him if he had money. So what is this saying to the saints? If they preach the gospel, they may meet the red horse – that is, lose their lives – or they may meet the black horse – that is, lose their jobs, in which case they will not have money for food. The black horse is economic persecution.

4th seal – Pale horse = All men suffer from certain troubles (6:7-8).

And when he had opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth beast say, Come and see. And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

Following the black horse is a pale horse whose rider is Death, accompanied by Hell. To Death was given the power to kill a fourth of the earth with war, famine, death (perhaps pestilence), and wild beasts. The connotation here is of natural disasters. There are certain troubles (the famine, disease, destruction, and death that follow war, the predation of wild beasts, and such natural disasters as fire, flood, wind, and rain) that always plague mankind (believers and unbelievers alike). They are symptoms of the Wrath which God visits on a sinful earth.

Less dire, but nonetheless hurtful and unpleasant are some of the other consequences which a disciple may experience.

A disciple may find himself in the company of King David – that is, despised by his spouse.

And it was told king David, saying, The LORD hath blessed the house of Obed-edom, and all that pertaineth unto him, because of the ark of God. So David went and brought up the ark of God from the house of Obed-edom into the city of David with gladness.

And it was so, that when they that bare the ark of the LORD had gone six paces, he sacrificed oxen and fatlings. And David danced before the LORD with all his might; and David was girded with a linen ephod. So David and all the house of Israel brought up the ark of the LORD with shouting, and with the sound of the trumpet. And as the ark of the LORD came into the city of David, Michal Saul’s daughter looked through a window, and saw king David leaping and dancing before the LORD; and she despised him in her heart. (KJV 2 Sam 6:12-16)

A disciple may find himself rejected by his father or mother, brother or sister, son or daughter.

Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me. (KJV Matt 10:34-38)

Because for thy sake I have borne reproach; shame hath covered my face. I am become a stranger unto my brethren, and an alien unto my mother’s children. For the zeal of thine house hath eaten me up; and the reproaches of them that reproached thee are fallen upon me. (KJV Ps 69:7-9)

A disciple may find himself in the company of Job – that is, rejected by everyone whom he holds near and dear.

He hath put my brethren far from me, and mine acquaintance are verily estranged from me. My kinsfolk have failed, and my familiar friends have forgotten me. They that dwell in mine house, and my maids, count me for a stranger: I am an alien in their sight. I called my servant, and he gave me no answer; I intreated him with my mouth. My breath is strange to my wife, though I intreated for the children’s sake of mine own body. Yea, young children despised me; I arose, and they spake against me. All my inward friends abhorred me: and they whom I loved are turned against me. (KJV  Job 19:13-19)

Judging by the above, one of the Lord’s disciples must expect to lose the following: his possessions; his livelihood; the love and respect of his parents, his siblings, his spouse, and his children; the affection of his friends; his standing in the community; and even his life – in a word, EVERYTHING.

Count the cost!

© 2017 John Holbrook Jr.

________________________________________

[1] Here is a book – actually a scroll – overflowing with words, and it is sealed with seven seals – that is, its seal is spiritually perfect. Moreover, it can be opened only by someone who is worthy – that is, by someone with a certain character – and John wept much because there was no man among the men in heaven, on earth, and under the earth that possessed the necessary character. Note: John does not weep anywhere else in the Book of Revelation, and there is much to weep about here. Clearly this book is of supreme importance. Whatever is in the book is vital to John and to all other believers. It is in God’s right hand, the hand of power: whatever is in this book deals with God’s exercise of sovereignty and power over his creation. This book contains the purposes of God: the decrees of God, the will of God, the plans of God, the methods of God in the exercise of his absolute sovereignty.  But the book is sealed. When God created man, he made him steward over the earth. Whatever man decided, that is the way things would be on earth. Alas, man decided to disobey God and follow Satan. By doing so, man gave Satan sovereignty over the earth, and the book of God’s purposes for man and the earth was sealed. A man’s sin sealed the book; only a man’s righteousness can unseal the book. But, “As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one” (Romans 3:10-12). Thus, there is no man that can open the book!

 

 

Reflections on the makeup of mankind

by John Holbrook Jr.
A Biblical View, Blog #027 posted January 16, 2017, edited March 9, 2021.

The image of God

At the very beginning of the Bible, the text quotes God as saying, “Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness.”[1] Then, in the very next verse, the Bible states, “So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created he them.”[2] A couple of things leap out of these verses. First, there is an important similarity between God and man. The nature of man is modeled on the nature of God. Second, the pronouns referring to God are both singular and plural and the pronouns referring to man are both singular and plural.

So what does that tell us? Well, in order to understand the makeup of man, we must understand the makeup of God. Moreover, we should be on the alert for an integration of the One and the Many in this makeup of humanity.

The Bible indicates that the Godhead is a tri-unity. It is often called the Trinity. It consists of three distinct persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Moreover, they did/do different things.

God-the-Father designed Universe and wrote its script, which together form the Decrees of God. Designs and scripts are conceptual entities – products of work on the part of a mind. God-the-Father is somehow associated with the mind.

God-the-Son made Universe and then entered it in the person of Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus was born of a mother, lived, died, rose from the dead, and ascended into heaven – all in bodily form. Universe and Jesus are material entities – products of work on the part of a body. God-the-Son is somehow associated with the body – or corporeality.

God-the-Holy Spirit energized Universe and gives life to its flora and fauna. Energy and life are mysterious entities – products of work on the part of something we do not understand. For the moment, I will say that something is the spirit.

So how do we know that the spirit exists? Everything, with which we are familiar, exhibits concept and actuality, but how do we understand spirit? I think the answer lies in two biblical passages. The first describes the anointing of the disciples by the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost:

And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind , and it filled all the house where they were sitting. And there appeared unto them cloven tongues as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.[3]

Here the spirit is likened to a “rushing mighty wind” and to “cloven tongues of fire.” The second passage describes a portion of the dialogue between Jesus and Nicodemus:

Jesus answered, “Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, ‘Ye must be born again.’ The wind bloweth where it will, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.[4]

Here too, the spirit is likened to “the wind” and Jesus points out that, like the wind, it cannot be seen, but its effects can be seen, heard, and felt. We can infer the presence of the spirit from its obvious effects. When we see and hear trees being stripped of its leaves and branches, then being brutally torn out of the ground, and finally being driven across the land in a tangle of broken roots and branches, we have no trouble understanding this destruction as one ill effect of a hurricane or tornado, even though we cannot see the wind or discern from whence it came.

Thus the Godhead exhibits an integration of three persons, the effects of whose activities are associated with separate phenomena: mind, body, and spirit.

Just how far does that get us? Well, it tell us that mankind might exhibit a tri-partite nature as well, and the effects of mankind’s activities might be associated with the same separate phenomena: body, mind, and spirit. That is, like God, the individual human might be a tri-unity.

The body

Let’s start with the body – sometimes called flesh and bones. Everyone has a body, and everyone knows that he or she has a body. First, using the five senses – i.e. sight, smell, sound, taste, and touch – I can see, smell, hear, taste, and touch my own body. Second, other people can see, smell, hear, taste, and touch my body. Thus, my body is material. It can be physically examined and measured by me and others. It has an objective reality. Oddly, however, a person actually knows very little about the body which he or she inhabits. Unless a person has studied biology, anatomy, medicine, etc., he or she is remarkably unaware of how the body is constructed or works. Moreover, even medical and scientific professionals have a limited understanding of it; they are discovering something new about it every day. Despite such limited understanding, however, they know that it is the most complex and fascinating object in the known part of Universe. As King David said to God, “…I am fearfully and wonderfully made; marvelous are thy works….” [5]

The mind

Now take the mind – sometimes called the soul or personality. First, the mind is distinct from the body.[6] Second, the mind is not equivalent to the brain. The brain is part of the body. It is the organic mass that resides in the head. It is an incredibly complex system of blood vessels, flesh, nerves, etc. It is material. It can be physically examined and measured. It has an objective reality. The mind, on the other hand, refers to a person’s consciousness and his or her sense of possessing a unique, personal integrity. An unconscious, unknown, and ultimately mysterious process converts information which the brain receives from other parts of the body via nerve signals into the mind’s experience of awareness, concepts, emotions, hunger, intentions, memories, music, perceptions, etc. The mind is immaterial. It cannot be physically examined and measured. It has a subjective reality. Its existence in others can only be inferred by me because they behave like I do.

The spirit

Finally take the spirit. The Bible indicates that it exists independently of the body and the mind.6 Like the mind, it is immaterial. It cannot be physically examined and measured. Unlike the mind, however, it does not have a subjective reality. A person can go through life without being aware of it.

So how do we know that the spirit exists? In light of what we know about God-the-Holy Spirit, we can infer its presence from its obvious effects. It is the vehicle through which God gives every person (a) a rudimentary awareness of God’s existence[7] – whether acknowledged or not – and (b) a rudimentary conscience[8] which distinguishes between good and evil – whether heeded or not. It is also the vehicle through which God gives some people a second birth, after which he and his commandments become the focus of their lives.

Consider the case of Charles ”Chuck” Colson. He served as Special Counsel to President Richard Nixon from 1969 to 1973. He was regarded as Nixon’s hatchet man. He hurt many people, and they and others came to despise him. In the aftermath of the “Watergate Scandal” and Nixon’s resignation from the presidency, however, Colson was suddenly “born again” while reading C.S. Lewis’s Mere Christianity.[9] He underwent a profound change of character and outlook. He publically expressed repentance for his misdeeds and begged forgiveness from the people whom he had hurt. In 1974, he plead guilty to charges of “obstruction of justice” and served seven months in a federal penitentiary. Most important, he began to glorify the Lord in both word and deed, of which the founding of the non-profit Prison Ministry is probably the most famous. Initially many non-Christians questioned his sincerity and accused him of using “religion” as a way both to deflect attention from his misdeeds and to make money. As the years passed, however, and people saw him consistently giving away most of his income to Christian causes and spending all his time and energy serving others, therewith affecting thousands of lives to the good, such criticism died down and eventually went away. What was left was a testimony to the power of the Holy Spirit to affect the spirit of a person and thereby alter the nature and focus of his or her life.

In view of the above, we can say that mankind, like God, exhibits an integration of the One and the Many. First, mankind consists of males and females, who have different natures and different roles to play in the human drama. Men provide for and protect their women and children. Women help their husbands and bear and raise their children. Second, each person is a tri-unity. He or she consists of a mind, which probably reflects the intellect of God-the-Father, a body, which probably reflects the corporeality of God-the-Son, and a spirit, which probably reflects the presence and power of God-the-Holy Spirit. Thus we can understand what God meant when he said, “Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness.”

One further point needs to be made. The Bible indicates that every person is born with a tendency to sin, and this sinfulness separates him or her from God. The person is therefore “spiritually dead,” which is why so many people are unaware of the spiritual part of them. Only by accepting the Jewish Messiah, God-the-Son, as Lord and Savior will a person receive “new life” from the God-the-Holy Spirit, who is the Giver of Life. At this point, he or she becomes conscious of the spirit within and tries to follow its leading on the journey of life.

Heed the words of Jesus: “Ye must be born again.”

© 2017 John Holbrook Jr.

_________________________________________

[1] KJ21 Genesis 1:26.

[2] KJ21 Genesis 1:27.

[3] KJ21 Acts 2:1-4.

[4] KJ21. John 3:5-8.

[5] KJ21 Psalm 139:14.

[6] See Matthew 10:28, Acts 2:27,31, 1 Thessalonians 5:23, and Hebrews 4:12.

[7] Romans 2:19-23.

[8] Romans 2:14

[9] The same book which played an important role in my own conversion from atheist to evangelical Christian.

Is God wholly – or only partially – sovereign over his creation?

by John Holbrook Jr.
A Biblical View, Blog #026 posted January 9, 2016, edited March 9, 2021.

There is much confusion today over the issue of God’s sovereignty over his creation – i.e.  Universe. The atheist dismisses the issue because he does not believe in God. The deist grants God’s sovereignty over his creation of Universe, but believes that he subsequently left it to develop on its own. Christians have expressed a range of beliefs on the issue, which are mostly focused on how men establish a relationship with God.

Early Christians believed the following: that all men are sinful (the doctrine of original sin), that God entered his Creation in the person of Jesus of Nazareth (the doctrine of the incarnation), that Jesus lived a perfect life (the doctrine of the sinlessness of Christ), that Jesus died on the cross at Calvary as a perfect, one-time payment for some men’s sinfulness (the doctrine of atonement), that God-the-Father ordained just who those men would be before the foundations of the world were laid (the doctrine of predestination[1]), that God raised Jesus from the dead (the doctrine of the resurrection), that Jesus ascended into heaven (the doctrine of the ascension), that only God-the-Holy Spirit can enable men to accept God-the-Son as their Savior and Lord (the doctrine of grace), and that only God-the-Holy Spirit can enable men to resist temptation, turn away from sinning, and move closer to God (the doctrine of sanctification).

In the fourth century AD, some Christians jettisoned some of the above doctrines and began espousing the view that men are basically good and can establish a relationship with God on their own.[2] This view got them branded as heretics.

Soon other Christians began occupying a middle ground between the above extremes.[3] They expressed the view that, although Jesus’ death on the cross was a necessary payment for men’s sinfulness, all men could now establish a relationship with God on their own, without the help of God-the-Holy Spirit. This got them too branded as heretics, but it survived such opposition and has waxed and waned through the succeeding centuries. Called Aminianism, it is quite common in our era, in which so many people clamor for unbridled, individual autonomy and exhibit disrespect for authority of all kinds – particularly divine authority.

The Testimony of the Scriptures

Departing from the early Christian’s beliefs on these issues, of course, entails ignoring much of what the Bible says about God’s sovereignty over his creation. Consider the following verses concerning God’s sovereignty over people’s salvation, the goal of which is the establishment of a right relationship with God:

Jesus said to His disciples, “But whom say ye that I am? And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven” (KJV Matthew 16:15-17).

Jesus also said to His disciples, “For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me. And this is the Father’s will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day. And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day” (KJV John 6:38-40).

Jesus also said to his disciples, “No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day” (KJV John 6:44).

Paul wrote, “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: according as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will” (KJV Ephesians 1:3-5).

Paul also wrote, “That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him: In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will: That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ. In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory” (KJV Ephesians 1:10-14).

Paul also wrote, “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them” (KJV Ephesians 2:8-10)

Paul also wrote, “But we are bound to give thanks always to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth: Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ” (KJV 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14).

Paul also wrote, “Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost” (KJV Titus 3:5).

The common denominator among the eight passages above is the testimony that the triune God is the prime actor in a person’s establishing a right relationship with God. In temporal sequence: God-the-Father wrote the names of the redeemed in the Book of Life before the foundations of the world were laid. The triune God created them. God-the-Son died on a cross to atone for their sins. Now God-the-Father draws them to his Son. God-the-Holy Spirit enables them to accept God-the-Son as their Savior and Lord, then cleanses and regenerates them, sets God’s seal on them, and finally enables them increasingly to resist temptation, turn away from sinning, and move closer to God. Although the redeemed will die physically, God-the-Son will resurrect them on the Last Day to live with Him throughout eternity.

2 Peter 3:9

One reason that some Christians ignore the above testimony is that they misinterpret the following verse: “The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some men count slackness; but is long suffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9). They maintain that it indicates that God-the-Father is unwilling that anyone perish. As Moreno Dal Bello has pointed out,[4] what they overlook is the verse’s context. Peter is writing to the “beloved” – i.e. the faithful disciples of Christ – who are already saved, but who are impatient for the Parousia, which will bring an end to this world. He tells them that they must be patient, for God will not bring the end until everyone whose name is written in the Book of Life has come into the Kingdom. God-the-Father is unwilling to have any of them perish, which would happen if the end came before they responded to the Gospel.

 The Nature of Creation

Another reason why so many Christians reject predestination is that they don’t understand the nature of Creation. It is a drama.

Before I examine the drama of Creation, I ask you to consider this aspect of any drama or play: it has an outside and an inside. Outside the drama, its author predetermines its every aspect. He creates each character, determining his or her gender and whether he or she is good or bad. He also predestines what he or she will do and say. Inside the drama, however, each person is free – free to decide what to do and what to say within the constraints of the drama’s world. He or she can behave well or badly, nobly or ignobly, and will be held accountable for his or her deeds and words within that world.

Now back to the drama of Creation. It has an author, God-the-Father. It has a producer and stage-manager, God-the-Son. It has a director, God-the-Holy Spirit. It has a cast: its protagonist is Jesus of Nazareth or God-the-Son; He follows the Father’s script exactly.[5] Its antagonist is Satan; he also follows the Father’s script exactly.[6] Its lesser players are all the men, women, and children in history. If both its protagonist and its antagonist are controlled by God-the-Father’s script, isn’t it reasonable to assume that the lives of its bit players are as well? Finally, it has a plot: God-the-Father is preparing a bride[7] for his Son despite the opposition of Satan and his minions.

The Bride of Christ

Now here is where the doctrine of predestination is so important. Why did God-the-Father determine the makeup of the Bride of Christ before he allowed the other persons of the Trinity to lay the foundations of the world? The answer is pretty obvious. She is at the center of the drama’s story. She is the girl for whom the protagonist and the antagonist are contending (see my blog, “Will the guy get the girl?” which was posted on September 5, 2016).[8] Ask yourself the question, “Would God-the-Father leave the composition of his Son’s bride to be determined by the whim of bit players in the drama? Would he allow them to decide for themselves whether or not they will accept or reject God’s offer of salvation through faith in Jesus as their Lord and Savior. No. God-the-Son will have to live with His bride for all eternity. She must be perfect. God-the-Father designed her before Universe was created. Now she is being formed, educated, and trained to be a help-mete for her future spouse, to whom she is betrothed. When God-the-Father presents her to his Son, she will be perfect. There will be no surprises.

If you remain unconvinced on this issue, imagine a drama in which every member of the cast is free to say and do whatever he or she chooses to say and do. The result would not be a drama. It would be chaos. Consider Othello, The Moor of Venice. Imagine the thought and effort which the author[9] put into crafting the plot, the action and the lines for Othello, Desdemona, Iago, Cassio, Brabantio, Roderigo, Emilia, and Bianca. They create the drama. If the actors abandoned the script, there would be no drama. Consider what would have happened if Othello had decided to give Desdemona a dozen roses instead of a handkerchief. Or if Desdemona had tried to wipe Othello’s face with her sleeve instead of her handkerchief. Or if Othello had put the handkerchief in his pocket, instead of dropping it on the floor. Or if Emelia had decided not to pick up the handkerchief. Or if Emelia had decided to keep the handkerchief for herself instead of giving it to Iago. Or if Iago had put something else in Cassio’s room instead of the handkerchief. Or if Cassio had failed to notice the handkerchief in his room. Or if Bianca had showed no interest in the handkerchief that Cassio was carrying. Etc. The play would fall apart.

The Testimony of God’s Person

There is one more point that I want to make. Still another reason why so many Christians claim that they responded to the Gospel of Christ of their own free will is that they don’t grasp the infinite extent of God’s intellect, power, imagination, inventiveness, etc.

The Scriptures indicate that God designed, created, and manages Universe, which is the theater in which the drama unfolds, and the earth, which is the stage on which the drama occurs. He controls the movement of every atomic particle, every atom, every molecule, every drop of water, every grain of sand, every celestial body, every galaxy, etc. He ordains every sunrise and every sunset, every cloudless day and every thunderstorm, every meteor shower and every volcanic eruption.

The Scriptures also indicate that God designed, created, and manages the earth’s creatures. He controls every minnow or whale, every ant or elephant, every butterfly or eagle, and every man, woman, or child. He numbers the hairs on each creature’s body. He determines when, where, and why a sparrow falls. He selects the members of each family, church, and nation. He ordains when a nation can live in peace and when it will be engaged in war. Absolutely nothing lies outside his purview and control – particularly something so important as the makeup of the bride whom God is preparing for God-the-Son.

The point of all of the above is that God is wholly and absolutely sovereign over his creation.

© 2016 John Holbrook Jr.

__________________________________

[1] The doctrine of predestination was strongly advocated by Augustine (354-430 AD) and Calvin (1509-1564 AD).

[2] Opposition to the doctrine of predestination may have started with Pelagius (c.355-c.425 AD) and been exacerbated by his follower Coelestius, a contemporary of Augustine. They rejected (a) the doctrine of original sin by claiming that children are born innocent and (b) the doctrine of the general depravity of man by claiming that men are basically good, and (c) the doctrine of grace by claiming that men have the capacity to resist evil, be good, and seek God without God’s help. This led him to claim that men can earn salvation by keeping the law – i.e. Christ’s death on the cross was an unnecessary ingredient in salvation. Pelagianism was fought by Augustine and Jerome (c.347-c.420 AD) and ultimately condemned as heretical by the eastern and western churches at the Council of Ephesus in 431 AD.

[3] In the face of the church’s condemnation of Pelagianism, a softer version of it soon emerged, which was known as Semi-Pelagianism. Its adherents maintained that, while grace is necessary in order to receive salvation, God wills that all men be saved. Semi-Pelagianism was fought by Caesarius of Arles (468/470-542 AD) and condemned as heretical by the Council of Orange in 529 AD. Despite such condemnation, it was revived by Jacobus Arminius (1560-1609 AD), and later codified by his followers in the Remonstrants (1610). Its adherents today are usually called Arminians.

[4] See http://godsonlygospel.com/booklets/not_willing_that_any_should_perish.htm.

[5] See John 8:28-29; also Hebrews 10:7.

[6] See Job 1:6-12 and 2:1-6. Note that (a) Satan must appear in God’s throne room, (b) God requires Satan to give an account of what he has been doing, (c) God draws Satan’s attention to Job, and (d) God tells Satan exactly what he can and cannot do to Job.

[7] The Bride of Christ consists of all the men, women, and children in history who have faithfully trusted in and accepted God himself as their redeemer and Lord.

[8] Just as God put Adam to sleep, took flesh and bone from his side, formed Eve, and then presented Eve to Adam to be his bride on Day 6 of Creation Week, so God put Jesus to sleep on the cross, took blood and water from His side, is currently forming the “Bride of Christ,” and will present her to his Son to be His wife at the Wedding of the Lamb. Note that the Bible starts with a wedding between the First Adam and his bride and ends with a wedding between the Second Adam and His bride. These weddings are like bookends to the drama. Moreover note that, just as Satan tried to spoil the marriage of the First Adam, which he was able to do, so now he is trying to spoil the marriage of the Second Adam, which, according to the Scriptures, he will not be able to do. Nevertheless, the tension of the drama for God’s people in the audience derives from the fact that Satan seems to be succeeding in his efforts and only faith in the trustworthiness of the Word of God will sustain her through the trials which Satan has in store for her.

[9] Othello is attributed to William Shakespeare, but I believe Christopher Marlowe wrote all the plays that bear Shakespeare’s name.  See Calvin Hoffman’s The Murder of the Man Who Was ‘Shakespeare’, Julian Messner, New York, 1955.

 

The S’s of Sin, Salvation, & Sanctificiation

by John Holbrook Jr.
A Biblical View, Blog #025 posted January 2, 2017, edited March 9, 2021.

I have always enjoyed using alliteration in my writing. In June of 2002, I decided to put man’s predicament and God’s solution to it in alliterative form.

Sovereignty is the issue. Who is in charge? Who makes the rules?

Sin is the problem. Sin involves a refusal to recognize and acknowledge God’s sovereignty; the sinner believes that the self (or some being other than God) can be sovereign. Sin seduces, beguiling the sinner into sinning, and swindles, blinding the sinner to his own sinfulness and to his subservience to Satan. Indeed, the sinner is a slave and stuck in bondage – that is, the sinner is helpless and cannot escape from this situation through his own efforts. Sin is both systemic – that is, it characterizes everything that a person thinks, says, or does – and sweeping or universal – that is, it is embedded in every man, woman, and child excepting Jesus. Finally, sin separates the sinner from God.

The sentence or penalty for sin is death.

Only the death of a satisfactory substitute can save the sinner from the sentence of death (what cannot save him is the attempt to be good or otherwise earn his way into God’s favor, because he will always fall short; he cannot be good enough).

Only the Sinless Sheep, “the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world,”[1] can provide a satisfactory substitute. He is both divine (the Son-of-God) and human (the Seed-of-the-Woman), and therefore He – and He solely – can bridge the gap between an infinite, omniscient, omnipotent, holy Creator and a finite, ignorant, impotent, and sinful creature. He does this both in His person and in His works.

Only the Spirit-of-God can enable a sinner to see his sinfulness and his need for salvation and then sanctification.

Salvation (deliverance from the consequences of sin) requires sorrow and self-reproach for one’s sins, repentance (a turning away from one’s sins), faith in the finished work of the Sinless Sheep on the cross, and surrender to the Sinless Sheep as one’s Savior and Sovereign. It costs nothing excepting damage to one’s pride; it is a free gift from the hand of a loving and merciful God. It results in safety – that is, the believer enters God’s sanctuary, where he is sheltered and shielded from the depredations of the Devil.

Sanctification (deliverance from the power of sin) requires constant struggle against temptation, constant study of and submission to the Scriptures (the Word of God Written), and frequent suffering (the most overlooked and least understood aspect of a disciple’s walk with the Lord). It therefore costs something – the greater the sanctification, the greater the cost – but also the greater the reward.

A saint is a sinner who has been saved and is undergoing sanctification.

© 2016 John Holbrook Jr.

______________________________________

[1] John 1:29.

Could the declaration of the heavens have been any louder at Messiah’s birth?

By John Holbrook Jr.
A Biblical View, Blog #024 posted December 25, 2016, edited March 9, 2021.

According to my chronology, Messiah was crucified during Passover on Nisan 14 in 33 AD (6:00 pm on Thursday, April 2 to 6:00 pm on Friday, April 3) in the middle of His fourth year of ministry. Since His ministry lasted 3,5 years, that places the start of His ministry in early October 29 AD. Since His 40-day Sojourn in the Wilderness preceded the start of His ministry, that places the start of His 40-day sojourn in the wilderness in late August, 29 AD. Since He departed for His sojourn immediately after His 30th birthday, His 30th birthday occurred in late August 29 AD; and His birthday, in late August of 2 BC.

I was struggling to pinpoint the exact date of Messiah’s birthday when I discovered Ernest Martin’s The Birth of Christ Recalculated, Foundation for Biblical Research, Pasadena, CA, 1980. It identifies the following astronomical events as having occurred in the period between August 3 BC and December 29, 1 BC (page locations follow EM in the citations below). August 28, 2 BC was Tishri 1 (the Feast of Trumpets or Rosh Hashanah), just the day one might expect for the First Advent of the Savior of the world.

On August 12, 3 BC, after leaving the vicinity of the Sun, Jupiter (the Father) conjoined with Venus (the Mother), and together they rose as an unusually bright morning star. Jupiter was often associated with the birth of kings, and this event would have been regarded as a harbinger of the birth of a king. Meanwhile, the sun (the Supreme Father), the Moon (also a mother), and Mercury (the Messenger of the gods), congregated in the constellation Leo (the Lion) – not only was Leo Judah’s natal sign, but Messiah was called “the Lion of the Tribe of Judah.” (EM pp.13-14)

During the next twenty days, Mercury moved toward Venus in the constellation Leo (their conjunction occurred circa September 1, 3BC), while the Sun moved out of the constellation Leo and into the constellation Virgo (the Virgin) and Jupiter entered the constellation Leo. These events appear to echo some of the themes surrounding Messiah’s first advent, when a Messenger, John-the-Baptist, would announce the coming of a prince (Gabriel’s term for Messiah in the vision he gave to Daniel), who would be born as the Son of God-the-Father and Miriam (a virgin mother) and would reign over all as King-of-kings and Lord-of-lords. (EM pp.13-14)

On September 14, 3 BC, Jupiter conjoined with Regulus (the King, a star of the first magnitude and the chief star of the constellation Leo). (EM p.15)

On February 17, 2 BC, Jupiter again conjoined with Regulus. They were joined by the Moon. (EM p.16)

On May 8, 2 BC, Jupiter again conjoined with Regulus. (EM p.16)

On June 17, 2 BC, after continuing its westward passage across the sky, Jupiter conjoined with Venus in the constellation Leo at the exact time of a full Moon. The two planets were so close that they would have appeared as one gigantic star in a marriage union. (EM p.16)

On August 27, 2 BC, Jupiter and Mars (the Warrior) conjoined, with Mercury and Venus nearby. Together the four stars constituted what in astrological circles is known as a “massing” in the constellation Leo. At the same time, the Sun was entering the constellation Virgo. (EM p.17)

The next day was Saturday, August 28, 2 BC, which was both the Sabbath and Tishri 1 (the Feast of Trumpets = Rosh Hashanah) – the perfect day for the birth of Messiah.

On December 25, 2 BC, after leaving the company of Mercury, Mars, and Venus and travelling westward for four months, Jupiter stopped in the sky – having reached a stationary point between its progression and regression with respect to Earth. It would have appeared motionless in the sky for a period of six days centered on that date. From the perspective of Jerusalem at dawn, the normal time for astronomical observations, Jupiter would have been located in the meridian position at an elevation of 68 degrees above the southern horizon, which would have put it in the abdomen of Virgo (the Virgin) and directly over Bethlehem, toward which the Magi were traveling. In addition, the Sun reached the Winter Solstice on December 21/22 and therefore was also standing still in the sky. (EM pp.21-22) [1]

On December 29, 1 BC, an eclipse of the moon occurred which would have been visible throughout Palestine. This was undoubtedly the day on which Herod had a man named Matthias executed and another man named Matthias deprived of the position of High Priest. (EM pp.21-22)

While he was creating Universe, God said,

“Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and for seasons, and for days and years.” [2]

Three millennia later, King David wrote,

The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth His handywork. Day upon day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge. There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard. Their sound is gone forth through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. In them hath He set a tabernacle for the sun, which is as a bridegroom [3] coming out of his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race. His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof. [4]

One millennium after that, Luke wrote,

And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night. And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them, and they were sore afraid. And the angel said unto them, “Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. And this shall be a sign unto you: Ye shall find the Babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger.” And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.” [5]

© 2016 John Holbrook Jr.

___________________________________

[1] Perhaps the Magi arrived in Bethlehem on December 25th, and their paying homage to and bearing gifts for the infant Jesus marked the beginning of celebrating Christmas on that day, which has always been associated with the worshipping of the Lord and the giving and receiving of gifts.

[2] KJ21 Genesis 1:14.

[3] According to the Scriptures, Messiah came to earth to save His bride.

[4] KJ21 Psalms 19:1-6.

[5] KJ21 Luke 2:8-14.

 

Do you know the social consequences of contraception and abortion?

by John Holbrook Jr.
A Biblical View, Blog #023 posted December 19, 2016, edited March 9, 2021.

 Last week, I wrote about what happened to Ana Rosa Rodriquez in 1991 and wondered what had happened to her since then. This week I wonder how many people know the social consequences for a nation which touts contraception and abortion, where women put their careers before their family, practice contraception, and abort their babies when they regard the latter as inconvenient. These consequences are worth thinking about.

God’s Plan

God has designed mankind in such a way that producing a child requires both a man and a woman. Moreover God has endowed each man and each woman with a strong sexual interest in members of the opposite sex to ensure that men and women will reproduce and thereby populate the earth. Because sexual desire is a bit like fire, however, it needs to be controlled. God has established two institutions to contain it: first, marriage, with its public rite, to bind a man and a woman together in a covenantal relationship for life and second, the family, with its different and complementary roles, to ensure a loving, harmonious, and secure social unit. The husband protects and provides for his wife and children. The wife helps her husband and nurtures their children. The children inherit many of their parents’ traits, learn from their parents, support their parents in their old age, and inherit their parents’ estates after they die. In addition, if each individual family contains several children, over three or four generations the size and extent of the common family grows into a multigenerational network of great-grandparents, grandparents, parents, brothers and sisters, great-uncles and great-aunts, uncles and aunts, first and second cousins, etc. who know, love, and care for one another in a myriad of ways.

What disrupts God’s Plan?

What disrupts the above plan? Among others are the following:

First, sexual relations outside marriage.

Second, using contraceptives to avoid pregnancy. Doing so severely limits the number of children per family.

Third, pregnancies outside marriage. In a previous era, a pregnancy would propel a couple into marriage. Today, however, the father often ducks his duties and responsibilities and abandons the mother to face three choices: abortion, single motherhood, or adoption.

Fourth, abortion. It has killed almost 60 million babies in the US since 1973 and more than 1.4 billion babies worldwide since 1980 – statistics hardly pleasing to God, who is the giver of life.

Fifth, single-motherhood. It condemns children to a fatherless childhood in a home where the mother usually struggles to survive.

Sixth, homosexuality. It is a barren activity, removing people from the possibility of becoming parents. Various attempts are made to circumvent this problem. Both male and female couples adopt children or use surrogates to produce children for them. Both methods condemn children to either a fatherless or a motherless childhood without experiencing a normal family.

In addition to thwarting God’s intentions for them, all of the above disruptions encourage men and women to focus on satisfying their own ambitions and desires, not on fulfilling their God-given roles in the scheme of creation.

The Results

What then are the consequences of these departures from God’s plan? Among others are the following:

 Men without manhood – Before the era of contraception and abortion, nothing propelled a young man from boyhood to manhood quicker than marriage, in which he had to undertake the duties and responsibilities of protecting and providing for his wife and the children who started arriving soon thereafter. Now, absent the incentive to marry in order to obtain ready access to sexual relations, young men remain boys for years. They lead self-centered and frivolous lives, focused on attending sporting events, watching them at sports bars, going on canoeing and fishing trips with their buddies, and often living at home, where their indulgent mothers provide them with meals, laundry service, etc.[1]

Women without womanhood – Before the era of contraception and abortion, young women looked forward to marrying, home-making, and child-rearing. With the help of their mothers, they prepared for it. Now, absent young men’s interest in marriage and the drumbeat of feminism, they lead self-centered, competitive, and often barren lives in the workplace, which accustoms them to putting the demands of their careers before the needs of their current or future families.

Children born well after their mothers’ prime child-bearing years. In previous years, women bore most of their children before they reached age 30. Now they bear most of their children after the age of 30. That people, including children, today are beset by a bewildering array of previously rare illnesses is becoming increasingly obvious – e.g. allergic reactions to dust, eggs, hay, milk, nuts, pets, pollen, wheat, etc.; autoimmune diseases like coeliac disease, diabetes type 1, lupus, multiple sclerosis (MS), myositis, etc.; digestive troubles like Crohn’s disease, irritable bowel syndrome, ulcerative colitis, etc.; mental health problems like attention deficit disorder (ADD), autism, obsessive-compulsive disorder, (OCD), Tourette’s syndrome, etc.; obesity; etc. These conditions are being called “21st century illnesses” and are ascribed to many causes. I have yet, however, to see the lateness of their mother’s age at birth identified as possibly one of them. Is not that lateness worth considering? (Another factor here may be what years on “the pill” do to a woman and later to her children.)

Children without homes – Before the era of contraception and abortion, children grew up in houses filled with the almost full-time presence of their mothers, brothers, and sisters. These houses were called “homes” and they were the crucibles of development and socialization, where young people learned how to live, play, and work in a rough and tumble environment, among others with different ages, different genders, and different personalities, each with his or her own abilities, aspirations, desires, needs, strengths, and weaknesses. Now such family life is impoverished in many ways. With wives/mothers working, husbands assume household duties that distract them from their main job – protecting and providing for their families. Working wives/mothers are torn between the conflicting demands of career and family. They try to ameliorate the situation by having few children – usually two, often one, sometimes none. Children often return from school to empty houses, in which TV sets and electronic devices are the only sources of companionship and entertainment. Soon bored, they seek out their peers on the streets, where they often get into trouble.

Families without both parents – Before the era of contraception and abortion, single parent households were relatively rare – usually due to workplace disasters in the case of men, birthing complications in the case of women, and lethal diseases. Now single parent households are ubiquitous, and the percentage of them is growing at an alarming rate.

A missing husband/father – Without a husband, a woman often falls into a series of temporary relationships which lack commitment on the part of both parties – a poor example for any children in the house. More often than not, single-motherhood results in both poverty and troubled children. Without fathers to discipline and mentor them, boys seek out the company of their peers and follow the downward trajectory of rebellion, hooliganism, crime, prison, and often death. Without fathers to love and protect them, girls grow up unable to discern between immature, unreliable boys and mature, reliable men and follow the downward trajectory of careless liaisons, pregnancies, and abortions or single-motherhood. The life of a family without a husband/father is usually somewhat desperate.

A missing wife/mother – Wife/mothers’ abandoning their families is on the rise. Many young women are unprepared for the sacrifices necessary to help a husband, make a home, and rear children. They bolt, leaving the husband to figure out how to protect and provide for his family, maintain a home, and rear his children without a woman’s touch. Without a mother, boys grow up unable to discern what kind of a wife and mother a potential mate might make. Without a mother, girls grow up without models or mentors – let alone the mother-daughter intimacies that best come from their own flesh and blood.

Families without relatives – Before the era of contraception and abortion, large families and even clans were common. Each member knew dozens of people to whom he was tied by blood and on whom he could rely for companionship, mentorship, support, etc. Now, with each relative having only one or two children, the extended family has shrunk markedly. How many people now attend family gatherings on Thanksgiving or Christmas where 20-30 family members show up?

Nations without people – Before the era of contraception and abortion, nations could count on their populations growing – of course absent wars, epidemics, or natural catastrophes. Now, with couples deciding on two, one, or no children (an average of 2.2 children per couple is required to maintain a stable population), many nations find themselves in an abrupt decline in population.

Nations without workers – The first consequence of a decline in population is a reduction in the number of workers. Fewer people are entering the workforce, but more people are leaving the workforce as the population ages and the oldest retire. This hits the more socialistic nations the hardest. Basing their projections on a ratio of 7-8 worker to 1-2 pensioners, they granted generous social security benefits to their citizens in the expectation of rising productivity and tax revenues. Now, with that ratio dropping inexorably toward 1 to 1, many nations find themselves on the road to bankruptcy. The problem is particularly acute in nations which provide other social benefits like small business loans, free health care, low-income subsidies, unemployment compensation, retraining scholarships, single-mother support, disability pensions, old age homes, etc. For such nations, bankruptcy is approaching at the rate of a speeding express train.

Nations without a future – The ultimate consequence of a decline in population is such a severe loss in numbers that those who remain lose the ability and even the inclination to protect themselves from foreign invasion and occupation. As nations, they lose the will to live.

What is the lesson in all of the above? For me, it is, “Be not deceived, God is not mocked; for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap” (KJ21 Galatians 6:7). If we refuse to do things God’s way and insist on doing things our own way, we will pay a heavy price.

Not wanting to end on a negative note, I refer to what God said to ancient Israel when it had strayed from honoring him and obeying his commandments: “If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land” (KJV 2 Chronicles 7:14). God intended Israel to be a light and an example to the Gentile nations. I believe that he will treat the USA today in the same way that he treated ancient Israel. Christians, let us hurry to repent of our individual and collective sins and call upon the Holy One to show us mercy.

© 2016 John Holbrook Jr.

________________________________________________

[1] I am grateful to my mother for not indulging me. A week following my graduation from college, she informed me that I had three months to get out of the house and start making my own way in the world. I used those months to prepare myself for the rigors of boot camp in the US Marine Corps.

Santa Claus or Satan’s Claws?

by John Holbrook Jr.
A Biblical View, Blog #021 posted December 5, 2016, edited March 9, 2021.

For nineteen centuries, Christmas was associated solely with the birthday of Jesus Christ. Its name proclaimed its nature – “Christ’s mass” – and the event it celebrated, the incarnation of God Himself in the person of a tiny baby, born in a manger, was seen to be the most stupendous event in human history. It inspired some of the greatest literature, music, painting, and sculpture ever crafted by human hands. The musical paeans range from the poignant strains of Silent Night to the grandeur and glory of Handel’s Messiah, but all pay homage to “the King of kings and Lord of lords” who “…shall reign forever and ever.”

During the twentieth century, however, Christmas was high-jacked by a Pretender to the Throne with an unlikely appearance – a rotund little man with twinkling eyes, a great white beard, a red suit with white trim and a floppy cap to match, a broad black belt with a gleaming buckle, and black boots.

Santa Claus (1)

Traveling in a sleigh drawn by reindeer, he flies through the air and delivers presents to the children of the world on “…the night before Christmas.”

Santa Claus in Sleigh (2)

His name is Santa Claus. Now, in the early years of the twenty-first century, Christmas in the public square and in most homes as well is devoted primarily to him.

Who is Santa Claus?

Let us start with a firm disclaimer. Santa Claus is not the historical Saint Nicholas, Bishop of Myra in Lycia, who was a staunch defender of the Orthodox Christian faith, who participated in the First Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, and who secretly distributed presents to the needy in his community. He would have been appalled to learn that his name would be associated with the “Saint Nick” of the 21st Century.

A clue to Santa Claus’s true identity lies in the foregoing nickname. Who was most often called “Old Nick” in previous centuries? An examination of his person will soon answer the question.

Santa Claus is a counterfeit Christ.

Santa’s incommunicable or metaphysical attributes (excepting the last) are god-like:

God is eternal; so seems Santa – he is ageless.

God is omnipresent; so seems Santa – he is everywhere at once, observing the behavior of children in their homes throughout the world, reading letters from the world’s children and making toys in his shop at the North Pole, and delivering presents in his sleigh, etc.

God is omnipotent; so seems Santa – he can do almost anything. He flies through the air. He lands on the roofs of high-rise towers and peasant hovels. He descends through chimney flues which are too small for him and most of his gifts to pass through – or are even non-existent. In addition, he delivers more presents than either he or his sleigh could possibly carry (in a way, he repeats the miracle of the loaves and fishes, but with toys).

God is omniscient; so seems Santa – he knows everything about all children wherever they are: whether or not they are behaving, what they need, what they want, etc.

God is immutable; so seems Santa – he does not change.

God is infinite; so seems Santa – his knowledge, capabilities, and activities are without limits.

God is indivisible; so seems Santa – he is not divisible.

God is both one and many (the Godhead is a triunity consisting of three persons); so seems Santa – he is one person, but also a multitude of persons, appearing simultaneously in many places (homes, hospitals, offices, schools, stores, town and city sidewalks, etc.).

God is uncreated; only in this respect does Santa differ from Jesus. He was created by Thomas Nast and more fully developed by Clement Moore in the 19th century.

Santa’s communicable or moral attributes, however, reveal his nature more clearly:

God is perfect; Santa is imperfect – He misses some homes. He gives some bad children exactly what they want, and he fails to give some good children what they want.

God is truthful; Santa is untruthful – First, he lives a lie: although he admonishes children to be truthful, he exists and acts only because of the lie that he exists and acts. Second, he deflects children’s attention from Jesus, who said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me” (KJV John 14:6). Third, he withholds from children the true Gospel of Grace: that they will receive the free, unmerited gift of eternal life in the presence of God if they repent of their sins and accept Jesus as their Redeemer and Lord. Lastly, he beguiles children with the false Gospel of Works: that they will earn a reward if they are good. Alas, no one can be good enough.

God is benevolent; Santa is malevolent –He encourages children to believe in him and his word. When children inevitably discover that he is a myth and that his word is not trustworthy, they realize that they have been deceived – deceived by Santa, deceived by their parents, and deceived by society. As a result, they become far less willing or able to believe the other Christmas story, the story of how God entered into his own creation in the person of a baby who was born in a manger. They reason: if Santa is a myth, so also must be Jesus. Santa may look jolly and benevolent, but he is actually a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

God is holy; Santa is unholy – He concerns himself exclusively with material things, and he encourages children to focus on and covet material things. He does not encourage them to eschew material things and to find their satisfaction and joy in knowing God and his Word (the Bible) and in serving God and others.

God is just; Santa is unjust – He tells children that he will reward them if they are good – particular if they are obedient to their parents – but then he distributes his gifts, not according to his stated criteria, but according to how rich the children’s parents are. A bad little rich boy will get much nicer presents than a good little poor boy. That is not just. Moreover, he never suggests that children be obedient to God.

God is merciful; Santa is merciless – In one sense, Santa is merciful in that he gives undeserved gifts – i.e. the treatment of the bad little rich boy above – but his mercy is bogus, for it is not extended in the context of the truth, but rather in the context of a lie (that we live in a godless, savior-less, ultimately unjust world where sin has no eternal consequences).

Again, who is Santa Claus?

Santa’s name and activities betray him. SANTA = SATAN (just move the N two places to the right, and you have the name of the great Deceiver and the Father of Lies himself) and CLAUS = CLAWS (just replace the U with a W – the sound remains the same – and you have Satan’s essential activity: getting his talons into people’s fleshly nature). Disguising himself as Santa Claus, Satan usurps Jesus’ place at His own birthday party and commences the corruption of souls at their most impressionable age, when they are toddlers. That he does so with the help of their parents – the very people to whom God has given the responsibility of protecting them from the depredations of the Evil One and of raising them in the knowledge and love of the Holy One, who is God-the-Son, the Lord Jesus Christ – is stunning in its cleverness and audacity.

That brings me to my conclusion: Santa Claus (or Satan’s Claws) is a personification of pure evil!

© 2016 John Holbrook Jr.

Who founded Rome – Aeneas or Romulus?

by John Holbrook Jr.
A Biblical View, Blog #020 posted November 28, 2016, edited March 9, 2021.

Most versions of ancient chronology put the Mycenaean Age c.1600-1100 BC, the Greek Dark Ages c.1100-900 BC, and the Greek Archaic Period c.900-500 BC.  My chronology, however, which takes the Bible as its point of departure, but which also owes much to Immanuel Velikovsky, amends this sequence. First, the Mycenaean Age existed c.1008-754 BC and constituted what the Ancients called the Greek Heroic Age. Second, the Greek Dark Ages never existed. Third, the Greek Archaic Period existed c.754-487 BC.

In the Aeneid, Virgil relates that, after the sack of Troy by the Greeks, the Trojan prince Aeneas sailed southwest across the Mediterranean Sea to Carthage, where he dallied with its Queen Dido, and then sailed northward to Italy, where he settled on a site that is now called Rome. In Roman records, their authors related that the twins Romulus and Remus founded Rome, for which the traditional date is 754 BC. Because of the muddled state of the chronology of the ancient world, there is a discrepancy of several centuries here, and both accounts are regularly dismissed as myths and legends.

According to my chronology, the Trojan War occurred from 812 to 802 BC. According to Virgil, Aeneas’s trip from Troy to Carthage took 7-10 years and his trip from Carthage to Rome took roughly three years. Thus he and his cohorts must have arrived in Rome, at the southern edge of Tuscany, sometime between 792 BC and 789 BC.

At the time, Tuscany was inhabited by the Etruscans. Because no dramatic, historical, philosophical, poetic, or religious texts have been found among their remains, very little is known about them.  I believe that they were central Europeans who descended into Tuscany in the tenth century BC to escape the glacial conditions in their native land and probably the predations of the Gauls. During the next couple of centuries, they developed from a primitive culture to an extensive agricultural community (a) bordered roughly by the Arnus River in the north, the Tiber River to the east and south, and the Tyrrhenian Sea to the west and (b) studded with towns such as Arretiuum, Caisra, Curtun, Clevsin, Felathri, Fufluna, Perusia, Tarchna, Veii, Velch, Velzna, Vetluna, and Volsinium. They reached the pinnacle of their vitality and prosperity circa 754 BC, when they suffered a blow from which they never recovered.

I believe that the blow was caused by a celestial thunderbolt discharged by Mars during its close passage to the earth circa 754 BC. In a later close approach of the planet Mars circa 665 BC, a celestial thunderbolt destroyed the Army of Sennacherib in Palestine. Such a  thunderbolt circa 754 BC probably created the basin in which Lake Bolsena now exists, and which lies about 50 miles northwest of Rome. According to Velikovsky:

A vivid picture of an interplanetary discharge is given by Pliny: ‘Heavenly fire is spit forth by the planet as crackling charcoal flies from a burning log.’ If such a discharge falls on the earth, ‘it is accompanied by a very great disturbance of air,’ produced ‘by the birth-pangs, so to speak, of the planet in travail’ (Pliny, Natural History, ii. 18).

Pliny says also that a bolt from Mars fell on Bolsena, ‘the richest town in Tuscanny,’ and that the city was entirely burned up by this bolt (Pliny, Natural History, ii. 53). He refers to Tuscan writings as the source of his information. By Tuscan writings are meant Etruscan books.

Bolsena, or the ancient Volsinium, was one of the chief cities of the Etruscans, the people whose civilization preceded that of the Latin Romans on the Apennine Peninsula. The Etruscan states occupied the area of what was later known as Tuscany, between the Tiber and the Arno. Near Bolsena, or Volsinium, is a lake of the same name. This lake fills a basin nine miles long, seven miles wide, and 285 feet deep. For a long time this basin was regarded as the water-filled crater of a volcano. However, its area of 117 square miles exceeds by far that of the largest known craters on the earth – those in the Andes in South America and those in the Hawaian (Sandwich) Islands in the Pacific. Hence, the idea that the lake is the crater of an extinct volcano has recently been questioned. Moreover, although the bottom of the lake is of lava, and the ground around the lake abounds with ashes and lava and columns of basalt, the talus of a volcano is lacking. Taking what Pliny said of an interplanetary discharge together with what has actually been found at Volsinium, one may wonder whether the cinders and the lava and the columns of basalt could possibly be the remains of the contact Pliny mentions.[1]

This thunderbolt would have devastated, not just Volsinium, but the entire area, thereby severely weakening other Etruscan cities in Tuscany and its southern neighbor Rome. Such conditions would have been an open invitation to invasion and occupation by a new force.

The origin of the Roman Monarchy is shrouded in mystery and myth, which may be due to the conditions created by the cataclysm of 754 BC.

The Roman stories concerning the foundation of Rome contain a number of common elements, some of which defy acceptance. One element is the identification of Alba Longa, a city 12 miles southeast of Rome, as the source of the founders of Rome. A second element is the upheaval in the royal family of Alba Longa, in which Amulius (a) seizes the throne from his brother, King Numitor, (b) kills his brother’s male heirs, and (c) forces his brother’s daughter Rhea Silvia to become a Vestal Virgin, which requires chastity. A third element is the identification of Rhea Silvia as the mother of twin boys – Romulus and Remus. A fourth element is the identification of either the god Mars or the demi-god Herakles as the father of the twins.[2] A fifth element is the abandonment of the boys in the Tiber river by order of Amulius. A sixth element is the miraculous preservation of the boys by animals. A seventh element is the raising of the two boys by a shepherd and his wife. An eighth element is the discovery by the youths of their identity as princes of Alba Longa. A ninth element is the youth’s successful venture to kill Amulius and restore the throne of Alba Longa to their father Numitor. A tenth element is their decision to found a new city together. An eleventh element is a quarrel between the two brothers concerning the exact site of the new city – either the Palentine Hill or the Aventine Hill – which resulted in the death of Remus. A twelfth element is the foundation of the new city by Romulus alone, who named it after himself.

Certain Roman historians reckoned that the birth of Romulus and Remus occurred in 771 BC, which means that Romulus would have been 17 years old at the time he founded Rome in 754 BC. That seems young. He might have been that or he might have been older. The important consideration here, however, is that there was no catastrophe involving Mars circa 771 BC, whereas there was such a catastrophe in 754 BC. I surmise that Mars was given credit (a) for the conception of the boys circa 771 BC rather than (b) for the creation of the opportunity for the boys to take over the site of Rome in 754 BC because doing so both preserved the role of Mars in the city’s founding and conferred semi-divinity on the city’s founder. Excepting for the seventh element above, the rest of the story is believable.

So who founded Rome: Aeneas circa 790 BC or Romulus in 754 BC? Take your pick.

© 2016 John Holbrook Jr.

____________________________________________________

[1] Immanuel Velikovsky in Worlds in Collision, pp. 272-273.

[2] Attributing conception to a god is an easy way for a young woman to avoid charges of fornication and was ubiquitous in the ancient world.